Molly Ringwald has made it clear she’s not interested in seeing the films of John Hughes remade and says the late writer-director felt the same way.
The 57-year-old actor, who starred in Hughes’ defining run of teen classics Sixteen Candles (1984), The Breakfast Club (1985), and Pretty in Pink (1986), said the filmmaker never wanted his movies revisited or reimagined.
Speaking with People, Ringwald explained that remakes were never part of Hughes’ vision. She noted that his films cannot be remade without his approval and said she personally agrees with his stance. Well, they can’t be [remade] because they can’t be made without the permission of [the late] John Hughes, and he didn’t want the films to be remade. And I don’t think that they should be really.”
Rather than recreating stories from another era, Ringwald said she would rather see filmmakers draw inspiration from The Breakfast Club and build something new that reflects the issues facing today’s generation.
“I feel like if somebody does something, I would prefer that they do something … that takes from [The] Breakfast Club and then builds on [it], and represents this generation’s issues rather than to try to recreate what was of a different time.”
The Breakfast Club famously follows five teenagers from different social circles who are forced to spend a Saturday in detention, starring Ringwald alongside Emilio Estevez, Judd Nelson, Ally Sheedy, and Anthony Michael Hall. More than four decades later, the film continues to resonate with audiences.
Ringwald has previously reflected on why the movie has endured, suggesting its staying power comes from its simplicity. In an earlier interview with Variety, she joked that the film’s longevity may be tied to the absence of supernatural elements.
“The Breakfast Club has endured for decades because there are no vampires in it. Any movie with teenagers now has to have a vampire, a zombie or a werewolf. I think that’s one of the reasons it has this lasting quality, because they haven’t been able to replicate it. It’s not for lack of trying. [The studio] gave John an awful lot of freedom for a relatively untested director.”
She added that Hughes was given an unusual amount of creative freedom at the time, especially for a relatively untested director, and that freedom allowed him to make something that hasn’t been easily replicated since.
In Ringwald’s view, the legacy of Hughes’ work lies not in remakes, but in encouraging new stories that speak honestly to the present moment.
ALSO READ:
Groundhog Day still trying to match up Bill Murray and Andie MacDowell
